Pro-Choice Washington Foundation
Standards Not Met
- 6
- 8
- 11
- 16
- 17
Standards Not Met
Standards Legend
- Meets Standards
- Standards Not Met
- Did Not Disclose
- Review In Progress
- Unable to Verify
Standards For Charity Accountability
Governance
-
Board Oversight
Oversight of Operations and Staff: Standard 1
Description
Organizations shall have a board of directors that provides adequate oversight of the charity's operations and its staff. Indication of adequate oversight includes, but is not limited to, regularly scheduled appraisals of the CEO's performance, evidence of disbursement controls such as board approval of the budget, fundraising practices, establishment of a conflict of interest policy, and establishment of accounting procedures sufficient to safeguard charity finances.The organization meets this standard.
-
Board Size
Number of Board Members: Standard 2
Description
Soliciting organizations shall have a board of directors with a minimum of five voting members.The organization meets this standard.
-
Board Meetings
Frequency and Attendance of Board Meetings: Standard 3
Description
An organization shall have a minimum of three evenly spaced meetings per year of the full governing body with a majority in attendance, with face-to-face participation. A conference call of the full board can substitute for one of the three meetings of the governing body. For all meetings, alternative modes of participation are acceptable for those with physical disabilities.The organization meets this standard.
-
Board Compensation
Compensated Board Members: Standard 4
Description
Not more than one or 10% (whichever is greater) directly or indirectly compensated person(s) serving as voting member(s) of the board. Compensated members shall not serve as the board's chair or treasurer.The organization meets this standard.
-
Conflict of Interest
Conflict of Interest: Standard 5
Description
No transaction(s) in which any board or staff members have material conflicting interests with the charity resulting from any relationship or business affiliation. Factors that will be considered when concluding whether or not a related party transaction constitutes a conflict of interest and if such a conflict is material, include, but are not limited to: any arm's length procedures established by the charity; the size of the transaction relative to like expenses of the charity; whether the interested party participated in the board vote on the transaction; if competitive bids were sought and whether the transaction is one-time, recurring or ongoing.The organization meets this standard.
Measuring Effectiveness
-
Effectiveness Policy
Board Policy on Effectiveness: Standard 6
Description
Have a board policy of assessing, no less than every two years, the organization's performance and effectiveness and of determining future actions required to achieve its mission.Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its board of directors does not have a policy that codifies its intention to review whether its programs and operations are fulfilling its mission. It does, however, complete strategic planning every three years.
-
Effectiveness Report
Board Approval of Written Report on Effectiveness: Standard 7
Description
Submit to the organization's governing body, for its approval, a written report that outlines the results of the aforementioned performance and effectiveness assessment and recommendations for future actions.The organization meets this standard.
Finances
-
Program Expenses
Program Service Expense Ratio: Standard 8
Description
Spend at least 65% of its total expenses on program activities.Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, indicate that the organization spent $144,776 or 43.67% of its total expenses, $331,546, on program service activities.
-
Fundraising Expenses
Fundraising Expense Ratio: Standard 9
Description
Spending should be no more than 35% of related contributions on fundraising. Related contributions include donations, legacies, and other gifts received as a result of fundraising efforts.The organization meets this standard.
-
Accumulating Funds
Ending Net Assets: Standard 10
Description
Avoid accumulating funds that could be used for current program activities. To meet this standard, the charity's unrestricted net assets available for use should not be more than three times the size of the past year's expenses or three times the size of the current year's budget, whichever is higher.The organization meets this standard.
-
Audit Report
Financial Statements: Standard 11
Description
Make available to all, on request, complete annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. When total annual gross income exceeds $1 million, these statements should be audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. For charities whose annual gross income is less than $1 million, a review by a certified public accountant is sufficient to meet this standard. For charities whose annual gross income is less than $250,000, an internally produced, complete financial statement is sufficient to meet this standard.Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:It does not have financial statements that were reviewed by a certified public accountant (CPA). A review is an accounting service providing some assurance to interested parties as to the reliability of financial data without the CPA conducting an examination in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS).
-
Detailed Expense Breakdown
Detailed Functional Breakdown of Expenses: Standard 12
Description
Include in the financial statements a breakdown of expenses (e.g., salaries, travel, postage, etc.) that shows what portion of these expenses was allocated to program, fundraising, and administrative activities. If the charity has more than one major program category, the schedule should provide a breakdown for each category.The organization meets this standard.
-
Accurate Expense Reporting
Accuracy of Expenses in Financial Statements: Standard 13
Description
Accurately report the charity's expenses, including any joint cost allocations, in its financial statements. For example, audited or unaudited statements which inaccurately claim zero fundraising expenses or otherwise understate the amount a charity spends on fundraising, and/or overstate the amount it spends on programs will not meet this standard.The organization meets this standard.
-
Budget Plan
Budget: Standard 14
Description
Have a board-approved annual budget for its current fiscal year, outlining projected expenses for major program activities, fundraising, and administration.The organization meets this standard.
Fundraising & Info
-
Truthful Materials
Misleading Appeals: Standard 15
Description
Have solicitations and informational materials, distributed by any means, that are accurate, truthful and not misleading, both in whole and in part. Appeals that omit a clear description of program(s) for which contributions are sought will not meet this standard. A charity should also be able to substantiate that the timing and nature of its expenditures are in accordance with what is stated, expressed, or implied in the charity's solicitations.The organization meets this standard.
-
Annual Report
Annual Report: Standard 16
Description
Have an annual report available to all, on request, that includes: (a) the organization's mission statement, (b) a summary of the past year's program service accomplishments, (c) a roster of the officers and members of the board of directors, (d) financial information that includes (i) total income in the past fiscal year, (ii) expenses in the same program, fundraising and administrative categories as in the financial statements, and (iii) ending net assets.Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:The organization did not produce an annual report for the past fiscal year.
-
Website Disclosures
Web Site Disclosures: Standard 17
Description
Include on any charity websites that solicit contributions, the same information that is recommended for annual reports, as well as the mailing address of the charity and electronic access to its most recent IRS Form 990.Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its website, prochoicewashington.org, does not include all of the recommended information for those charity websites that solicit for donations. Specifically, it does not include a link to the organization's most recent IRS Form 990 or an annual report.
-
Donor Privacy
Privacy for Written Appeals & Internet Privacy: Standard 18
Description
Address privacy concerns of donors by (a) providing in written appeals, at least annually, a means (e.g., such as a check off box) for both new and continuing donors to inform the charity if they do not want their name and address shared outside the organization, (b) providing a clear, prominent and easily accessible privacy policy on any of its websites that tells visitors (i) what information, if any, is being collected about them by the charity and how this information will be used, (ii) how to contact the charity to review personal information collected and request corrections, (iii) how to inform the charity (e.g., a check off box) that the visitor does not wish his/her personal information to be shared outside the organization, and (iv) what security measures the charity has in place to protect personal information.The organization meets this standard.
-
Cause Marketing Disclosures
Cause Related Marketing: Standard 19
Description
Clearly disclose how the charity benefits from the sale of products or services (i.e., cause-related marketing) that state or imply that a charity will benefit from a consumer sale or transaction. Such promotions should disclose, at the point of solicitation: (a) the actual or anticipated portion of the purchase price that will benefit the charity (e.g., 5 cents will be contributed to abc charity for every xyz company product sold), (b) the duration of the campaign (e.g., the month of October), (c) any maximum or guaranteed minimum contribution amount (e.g., up to a maximum of $200,000).The organization meets this standard.
-
Complaints
Complaints: Standard 20
Description
Respond promptly to and act on complaints brought to its attention by the BBB Wise Giving Alliance and/or local Better Business Bureaus about fundraising practices, privacy policy violations and/or other issues.The organization meets this standard.
Conclusion
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet the following 5 Standards for Charity Accountability:
Standard 6: Board Policy on Effectiveness - Have a board policy of assessing, no less than every two years, the organization's performance and effectiveness and of determining future actions required to achieve its mission.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its board of directors does not have a policy that codifies its intention to review whether its programs and operations are fulfilling its mission. It does, however, complete strategic planning every three years.
Standard 8: Program Service Expense Ratio - Spend at least 65% of its total expenses on program activities.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, indicate that the organization spent $144,776 or 43.67% of its total expenses, $331,546, on program service activities.
Standard 11: Financial Statements - Make available to all, on request, complete annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. When total annual gross income exceeds $1 million, these statements should be audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. For charities whose annual gross income is less than $1 million, a review by a certified public accountant is sufficient to meet this standard. For charities whose annual gross income is less than $250,000, an internally produced, complete financial statement is sufficient to meet this standard.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:It does not have financial statements that were reviewed by a certified public accountant (CPA). A review is an accounting service providing some assurance to interested parties as to the reliability of financial data without the CPA conducting an examination in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS).
Standard 16: Annual Report - Have an annual report available to all, on request, that includes: (a) the organization's mission statement, (b) a summary of the past year's program service accomplishments, (c) a roster of the officers and members of the board of directors, (d) financial information that includes (i) total income in the past fiscal year, (ii) expenses in the same program, fundraising and administrative categories as in the financial statements, and (iii) ending net assets.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:The organization did not produce an annual report for the past fiscal year.
Standard 17: Web Site Disclosures - Include on any charity websites that solicit contributions, the same information that is recommended for annual reports, as well as the mailing address of the charity and electronic access to its most recent IRS Form 990.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation does not meet this standard because:Its website, prochoicewashington.org, does not include all of the recommended information for those charity websites that solicit for donations. Specifically, it does not include a link to the organization's most recent IRS Form 990 or an annual report.
Pro-Choice Washington Foundation meets the remaining 15 Standards for Charity Accountability.
Purpose
-
Year, State Incorporated
1986, WA
-
Stated Purpose
Tto protect and promote every person’s right to access abortion and the full range of reproductive healthcare options affordably and equitably in Washington state through advocacy,community engagement, and education.
-
Also Known As:
NARAL Pro-Choice Washington Foundation, WA State NARAL Foundation
Programs
The Pro-Choice Washington Foundation is focused on grassroots advocacy, issue research, leadershipdevelopment, and community and decision-maker education. Their programs include:Grassroots Activism: Pro-Choice Washington Foundation provides resources, tools, trainings, and opportunities for people acrossWashington to take action for reproductive freedom in their own neighborhoods and communities.Leadership Development: Pro-Choice Washington Foundation educates and equips its members with the skills and power to drivechange for their own communities, through activist training, chapter development, and their fellowship program. Their growing network of activist chapters, who represent Washington state regions, high school students, and universities are a driving force in their advocacy. Activist chapters hold education events, letter-writing campaigns, and trainings to increase issue awareness in their communities. Pro-ChoiceWashington summer fellows also conduct cutting-edge research, activate allies through communityengagement, and develop the necessary leadership skills to become future reproductive freedom leaders.Member and Voter Education: Pro-Choice Washington Foundation provides information, updates, and tools for their members - in the form of blogs, fact sheets, talking points, and analyses – on their legislative priorities, decision-makers, and reproductive freedom issues across Washington and the country. This helps Pro-Choice Washington Foundation members to become moreinformed voters and to advocate more effectively within their communities for reproductive freedom.Research: Pro-Choice Washington Foundation produces research on the state of reproductive freedom in Washington to highlightbarriers to abortion and other reproductive services, such as the connection between white nationalist and anti-abortion groups, and the geographic distribution of restrictions to care across healthcare systems. Thiscontributes to the general knowledge of Washington state residents and informs their organizationalpriorities.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, Pro-Choice Washington Foundation program expenses were:
Programs | $144,776 |
Program Expenses | $144,776 |
Governance & Staff
-
CEO
Ms. Kia Guarino, Executive Director
-
Board Chair
Ms. Annabelle Burgett, Program Officer, Program Advocacy & Communications
-
Chair's Profession / Business Affiliation
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
-
Board Size
15
-
Paid Staff Size
8
Fundraising
Method(s) Used:
Direct mail appeals, Invitations to fundraising events, Grant proposals, Internet, Door-to-door appeals, Appeals via Social Media (Facebook, etc.).
% of Related Contributions on Fundraising: 31.74%
Tax Status
This organization is tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. It is eligible to receive contributions deductible as charitable donations for federal income tax purposes.
Financial
The following information is based on Pro-Choice Washington Foundation's IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020
Source of Funds | |
---|---|
Contributions and grants | $324,284 |
Government grants | $10,000 |
Investment loss | $-28,452 |
Total Income | $305,832 |
Breakdown of Expenses
Total Income | $305,832 |
Total Expenses: | $331,546 |
Program Expenses | $144,776 |
Fundraising Expenses | $106,102 |
Administrative Expenses | $80,668 |
Other Expenses | $0 |
Expenses in Excess of Income | $25,714 |
Beginning Net Assets | $301,808 |
Other Changes In Net Assets | $0 |
Ending Net Assets | $281,726 |
Total Liabilities | $29,423 |
Total Assets | $311,149 |
An organization may change its practices at any time without notice. A copy of this report has been shared with the organization prior to publication. It is not intended to recommend or deprecate, and is furnished solely to assist you in exercising your own judgment. If the report is about a charity and states the charity meets or does not meet the Standards for Charity Accountability, it reflects the results of an evaluation of information and materials provided voluntarily by the charity. The name Better Business Bureau ® is a registered service mark of International Association of Better Business Bureaus.
This report is not to be used for fundraising or promotional purposes.