Business ProfileforG.C. Environmental, Inc.

I hired GCU Environmental to address lead identified in my home including the dining room wall doorway casing, exterior entry door casing, exterior entry door outer jamb, exterior entry door header jamb, kitchen back entry door inner and outer jamb, and kitchen back entry door stop and header jamb.GCU Environmental did not follow the instructions provided by the ********************************** Inspector. Despite my insistence that the notice called for a wet scrape method, the contractor dismissed my concerns, citing their experience. Consequently, the exterior door casing was left untouched, while the contractor hastily removed the door frames, resulting in damage to my walls and refrigerator encasement. Nails were left in the ceiling, paint splatter was evident, and gaps appeared between the door frames and floor. The quality of work completed was subpar, especially considering the price tag of $5,500. Unnecessarily, two perfectly good doors were replaced, and the installation was below standard. I will likely need to hire another contractor to rectify the work performed.After the project was completed, I had to contact the owner of GCU Environmental multiple times to address several issues. The replaced front door lacked a peephole, alarm sensors, doorstop, and doorbell were neglected during reinstallation, and staples remained in the crown molding and ceiling. Additionally, the dining room entry door exhibited protruding nails, posing a safety hazard, and the patchwork performed on the wall near the fridge and backdoor was unsightly. Moreover, the screen door leading to the backyard does not close properly.Considering these issues, I request the following resolutions:1. Reimbursement for the project cost, as the completed work does not meet industry standards and necessitates additional expenses to rectify the damages.2. Compensation for the costs incurred in hiring another contractor to address the deficiencies and complete necessary repairs.