Complaints

• Initial Complaint

  07/30/2024

  Complaint Type:

  Product Issues

  Status:

  Answered

  More info

  At the beginning of 2024, I was informed about a supposed investment opportunity with ****** ****. He confidently claimed his investments always yielded returns, specifically through government investments. He assured me, without a doubt, that we would always get paid out and receive our money back. Taking him at his word, I invested a total of $10,000, with the promise of receiving $11,700 in return. To date, I have seen none of that money. Jeremy has continuously fed me excuses, claiming the funds were tied up with the bank, or that his bank account was hacked. Despite his assurances, he has provided no evidence to back up his claims. When questioned, he deflects by mentioning other investors, yet fails to produce any tangible results. The excuses are endless, and no payments have been made to date. Jeremy C*** has taken $100,000 from multiple individuals and has not repaid anyone. His actions are deceitful and unprofessional, and it’s clear he has no intention of fulfilling his promises. Blast My Market A.K.A. AppCropShop LLC Jeremy C*** **** ********* *** ************* ** ***** 216-421-4693 [email protected]

  Business response

  08/27/2024

  RECEIVED VIA EMAIL BY BBB STAFF MEMBER:

  BlastMyMarket.com and Jeremy C*** categorically reject the baseless allegations made in this
  complaint. These accusations are not only misleading but entirely unfounded, and we take them
  very seriously.

  First, it is essential to clarify the nature of the opportunity presented to the complainant. At no
  point was this a conventional investment in the sense of stocks, bonds, or other financial
  securities. Instead, what was offered was the chance to participate in a utility token program
  designed to access specific services that BlastMyMarket.com provides. This was clearly
  communicated from the outset. The complainant's claims about guaranteed returns are a gross
  misrepresentation of the facts and show a fundamental misunderstanding of what a utility token
  is.

  Clarifications and Facts:
  1. Utility Token, Not an Investment:
  ? The complainant was offered a utility token, which is not an investment in the
  traditional financial sense. Utility tokens are designed to provide access to a
  company's services or products and are not tied to any form of equity or
  securities. The expectation that these tokens would behave like stocks or bonds,
  providing a guaranteed return, is entirely misplaced.
  
  2. No Guarantees Were Ever Made:
  ? At no time did Jeremy C*** or BlastMyMarket.com guarantee specific financial
  returns or promise any timeline for repayments. The complainant's assertion that
  they were promised a return of $11,700 on a $10,000 contribution is a complete
  fabrication. The terms of the utility token offering were clear and explicitly stated
  that they were subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions, including the
  achievement of a minimum participation threshold. This was thoroughly
  communicated to all participants.
  
  3. Issues Beyond Our Control:
  ? As with any business dealing, certain delays and unforeseen complications can
  occur, especially in complex environments like government contracts. While it is
  unfortunate that there have been delays, these were due to factors beyond our
  control, including third-party banking issues and unrelated cybersecurity
  concerns. We have been fully transparent about these challenges and have been
  working diligently to resolve them.

  4. Baseless Allegations of Fraud:
  ? The complainant’s suggestion that Jeremy C*** and BlastMyMarket.com have
  been deceitful or engaged in fraudulent activity is not only false but defamatory.
  We have acted with integrity and in good faith throughout this process. Every
  communication with participants has been aimed at providing updates and clarity.
  The unfounded claim that we are running a Ponzi scheme is a serious accusation
  that we categorically deny. Such allegations are not only untrue but are
  damaging to our reputation and will be met with appropriate legal action if they
  continue.
  
  5. No Evidence of Misconduct:
  ? The complainant has failed to provide any concrete evidence to support their
  accusations. All transactions and communications have been conducted
  professionally and in line with the terms set out at the beginning of this process.
  We challenge the complainant to provide any proof that contradicts our clear and
  honest dealings.

  6. Commitment to Transparency:
  ? We remain committed to resolving any misunderstandings and to continue acting
  in a transparent manner. We have always been willing to provide any participant
  with information regarding the status of their tokens and the ongoing issues with
  third-party vendors.
  
  Conclusion:
  We stand by our track record of professionalism and commitment to our clients and participants.
  The baseless and defamatory nature of this complaint is evident to anyone who looks at the
  facts. We are prepared to defend our reputation vigorously and to take any necessary steps to
  protect our business from false and damaging allegations.
  We encourage any parties who have questions or concerns to contact us directly so we can
  provide the full context and clear up any misconceptions.

  Sincerely,
  Jeremy C***

• Initial Complaint

  07/18/2024

  Complaint Type:

  Product Issues

  Status:

  Answered

  More info

  Jeremy C***, operating under Blast My Market (a.k.a. AppCropShop LLC), offered an investment opportunity in telecommunication contracts for marketing services tied to government contracts and auto dealerships. Five individuals were swindled into investing a total of $160,000, with a promise of repayment within 30 days. My personal investment was for $30,000. When the deadline passed, **** feebly claimed that the vendor had delayed the payment. Weeks later, ****** story shifted. He falsely asserted that an employee from the vendor had accused them of fraud, necessitating a 90-day resolution period by the bank. We rightfully demanded proof from the bank or any supporting communication, **** gave an absurd excuse that the bank had provided no information and that he had to submit paperwork through a portal, raising immediate red flags. After the 90 days elapsed, we pressed **** about the money. ****** pathetic response was that he hadn't received it and was under investigation. He further confessed that he hadn't paid taxes for years, likely adding to his troubles. **** then had the audacity to suggest bringing in outside investors to gather more money to repay the original investors, essentially admitting to running a Ponzi scheme. His response to my concerns was infuriating: "Why should they care what I do with the money? As long as I pay them back." When questioned about who held the contracts and the vendor's identity, **** named Rusty D******. Upon reaching out to *******, we discovered he had also been scammed by **** out of investment money a decade ago. Months after the initial repayment deadline, we dug into ****** background and uncovered a disturbing pattern. For over ten years, other investors had been lured with the same bogus investment opportunities and had never seen a dime of their money. This man has been a fraud and a con artist for far too long, leaving a trail of deceived and frustrated investors in his wake.

  Business response

  08/12/2024

  
  In response to the allegations presented to the Better Business Bureau (BBB) against Jeremy **** and Blast My Market (AppCropShop LLC), it is important to address these claims with clarity, professionalism, and transparency.
  First and foremost, I want to assert that the characterization of funds received by Blast My Market as "investments" is a fundamental misunderstanding. These funds were not investments in a traditional sense, as they do not constitute an ownership stake or a claim to profits within the company. Rather, these contributions were made in the form of utility tokens, which are designed to provide specific access or services within the company. Utility tokens are fundamentally different from equity investments, and they are meant to be utilized at the discretion of the company to achieve specific project goals.
  It is essential to recognize that, like any other business venture, there are inherent risks and uncertainties. While we had ambitious plans to achieve certain milestones, external factors, including unforeseen delays and challenges, have impacted our timeline. These challenges are not uncommon in the tech and telecommunication industries, especially when dealing with complex government contracts and cutting-edge technologies.
  Regarding the usage of funds, it is critical to note that the allocation and management of these resources are protected under the company's privacy policies and intellectual property rights. Detailed disclosures about the specific use of funds are not typically shared with utility token holders due to the sensitive nature of the projects and the competitive landscape. This confidentiality is standard practice to protect the company’s strategic initiatives and proprietary information.
  As for the specific claims made in the complaint, I want to clarify that any communication delays or perceived lack of transparency were never intended to mislead or defraud. We have been navigating a complex situation involving multiple stakeholders, vendors, and legal considerations, which have unfortunately caused delays in our operations.
  In conclusion, while we understand the concerns raised, it is crucial to acknowledge the nature of the contributions made and the complexities involved in our projects. We are committed to resolving these issues and moving forward with our mission. However, without a federally recognized contract or sufficient liquidity tied to the utility tokens at this time, repayments or financial returns cannot be processed immediately. We urge all stakeholders to remain patient as we work towards achieving the goals that were initially set forth.
  Jeremy ****** ethics and commitment to his business and stakeholders remain unwavering, and any suggestion to the contrary is not only unfounded but deeply misrepresents the challenges and realities of running an innovative and forward-thinking company like Blast My Market.

*Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business. ↩