Cookies on BBB.org

We use cookies to give users the best content and online experience. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to allow us to use all cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy to learn more.

Cookie Preferences

Many websites use cookies or similar tools to store information on your browser or device. We use cookies on BBB websites to remember your preferences, improve website performance and enhance user experience, and to recommend content we believe will be most relevant to you. Most cookies collect anonymous information such as how users arrive at and use the website. Some cookies are necessary to allow the website to function properly, but you may choose to not allow other types of cookies below.

Necessary Cookies

What are necessary cookies?
These cookies are necessary for the site to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you that amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Necessary cookies must always be enabled.

Functional Cookies

What are functional cookies?
These cookies enable the site to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not function properly.

Performance Cookies

What are performance cookies?
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.

Marketing Cookies

What are marketing cookies?
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant content on other sites. They do not store personal information directly, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser or device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Find a Location

De-White Utility District has locations, listed below.

*This company may be headquartered in or have additional locations in another country. Please click on the country abbreviation in the search box below to change to a different country location.

    Country
    Please enter a valid location.

    ComplaintsforDe-White Utility District

    Utility Contractors
    View Business profile
    View Business profile

    Need to file a complaint?

    BBB is here to help. We'll guide you through the process.

    File a Complaint

    Complaint Details

    Note that complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. See details.

    Filter by

    Showing all complaints

    Filter by

    Complaint Status
    Complaint Type
    • Complaint Type:
      Billing Issues
      Status:
      Unanswered
      I am writing to lodge a formal complaint against DeWhite Utility District, located in Dekalb County, *********, for their unfair and uncommunicated practices regarding bill payment and service disconnection. I have been a loyal customer for over two years, and I am deeply disappointed and inconvenienced by their recent actions.On November 28, 2023, my water service was abruptly terminated without any prior notification. This disconnection was due to an outstanding balance of less than $65, which was merely 25 days overdue. The lack of any warning or attempt to communicate this impending action by DeWhite Utility District has caused significant distress and inconvenience to me.Furthermore, to restore my water service, I was charged an additional fee of $60, which I find exorbitant and unjust, especially considering the minor nature of the late payment and the absence of prior notice.I believe that DeWhite Utility District's actions violate fair consumer practices, especially regarding communication and the imposition of fees. Their lack of transparency and consideration for customers is concerning and warrants your attention.I kindly request the BBB to investigate this matter and ensure that DeWhite Utility District adheres to ethical business practices, including providing clear communication to customers about bill payments and service disconnections, and imposing reasonable fees. I also seek assistance in resolving this issue, potentially including the waiver of the $60 reconnection fee, given the circumstances of my case.Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am willing to provide any further information required and hope for a prompt and fair resolution.
    • Complaint Type:
      Service or Repair Issues
      Status:
      Answered
      My service was cut off on 7/20/22 without notice by DeWhite Utility. DeWhite sent my bill to the billing address and not mailing address. They claim they sent the July invoice to the proper address but I never received and they could not provide evidence. I was charged $60 to turn service back on and was never notified service would be terminated per the contract. They evidenced my August bill as notice, but that provides a due date of August 5th, not July 20th when service was terminated. I asked to have the fee waived but they refused. I pointed to the contract and their obligation to notify me before terminating service without any luck. I notified them I would have to dispute the $60 charge with my bank as they did not follow the terms of their own contract. I was then threatened by **** ******* to have my service turned off for the dispute, charged another $60 fee, and an additional $20 charge. A copy of the contract and August bill are attached. An acceptable resolution for me would to have $60 credited to my account for DeWhites failure to provide proper notice.

      Business response

      08/17/2022

      Business Response /* (1000, 8, 2022/08/17) */ DeWhite Utility Districts' contract does not state that notice will be given prior to disconnection. The contract states "accounts not paid by the 15th of each month will be subject to be discontinued (cutoff) and a fee of $60 will be charged for reconnection". The only place the contract mentions anything about notice of disconnection is under the "Is there any medical reason that services cannot be interrupted? (Written verification from a medical doctor is required before meter can be labeled as non-cut-off. The water bill is still required to be paid in full, but notification will be made prior to disconnect.)" The customer marked no to this question on the contract. The contract also states "the utility bills for services monthly, and bills are mailed in bulk at the US Post Office. The utility cannot guarantee the delivery of its bills. Failure to receive a bill does not relieve the customer of the responsibility of paying the bill". The customers first bill was mailed to the billing address he provided on the contract. It was returned with a forwarding address from the US Post Office and was remailed to the service address on June 17, 2022. The customer's first bill was due July 5, 2022 and was subject to disconnection after July 15, 2022. The customer was mailed their second bill on July 11, 2022 to the service address with a due date of August 5, 2022. Their past due amount from July 5, 2022 was clearly listed as "Past Due Amount" and the bill states in red letters "***Attention*** Due Date only applies to current charges. Any amounts listed as Past Due are subject to termination". The customer's service was not disconnected until July 20, 2022 which was ample time to receive his second bill that stated he had a past due bill. When the customer threatened to have the charge which included his July 5th bill reversed by his credit card company, he was notified that it would be treated as a returned charge and would be subject to a $20 return fee. Services would be disconnected immediately upon the returned charge as the payment was for a delinquent bill and reconnect fee thus an additional $60 reconnect fee would apply to have service turned back on. DeWhite Utlilty District is a public utility that serves water to the western portion of White/Dekalb county and is a government entity that has policies and procedures in place to protect past, present and future customers. This complaint was handled within those policies and procedures.

    Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.

    BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.

    BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.

    When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.

    BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.

    As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation.