Auto Manufacturers
Nissan Canada IncThis business is NOT BBB Accredited.
Find BBB Accredited Businesses in Auto Manufacturers.
Important information
- Customer Complaint:Due to the volume of complaints received, BBB is publishing the details (text) of 50% of complaints as a representative sample.
Complaints
This profile includes complaints for Nissan Canada Inc's headquarters and its corporate-owned locations. To view all corporate locations, see
Customer Complaints Summary
- 63 total complaints in the last 3 years.
- 24 complaints closed in the last 12 months.
If you've experienced an issue
Submit a ComplaintThe complaint text that is displayed might not represent all complaints filed with BBB. Some consumers may elect to not publish the details of their complaints, some complaints may not meet BBB's standards for publication, or BBB may display a portion of complaints when a high volume is received for a particular business.
Initial Complaint
Date:07/01/2025
Type:Product IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
The headlights are not allowing me to see anything. I have replaced the bulbs to no avail! These headlights are the worse I have ever seenBusiness Response
Date: 07/01/2025
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns regarding your vehicle's headlights. We regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint with the BBB.
With the information provided, we are unable to locate your profile within our database.
Kindly respond with the following information:
- Copy of your vehicle's provincial registration/ownership
- Vehicle Identification Number (VIN)
- The name of the Nissan Dealer who has investigated your concern
We look forward to your response.Initial Complaint
Date:24/12/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
Dear Nissan Canada Customer Service, I am writing to express my frustration with an issue concerning my 2016 Nissan Juke. After performing repairs on my car radio, I briefly turned on the vehicle with the passenger airbag indicator light disconnected. Subsequently, the airbag warning light on the dashboard began flashing continuously. Despite reconnecting the cable, attempting to reset the system, and clearing all error codes, the warning light persists. This issue appears to be linked to the "no error" error code, which, according to the Factory Service Manual (FSM), causes the airbag warning light on the dashboard to flash continuously. The FSM indicates that clearing a stored code may result in this flashing behavior, and the only solution provided is to use the proprietary Nissan Consult tool to clear the system. Notably, the ignition reset procedure—a method commonly used in older models—appears to have been removed from the FSM for the year 2016 and later, leaving customers no choice but to rely on dealerships for resolution. I find it unacceptable that I am expected to pay a $150 diagnostic fee at a dealership for a technician to use the proprietary Nissan Consult tool to clear this "no error" error code. This situation ***** *** ********** **** *** ****** ** ************* ******** ** ****** customers to incur unnecessary and exorbitant fees for addressing a very simple issue that should be easily resolvable. I urge Nissan Canada to address this matter promptly by waiving the diagnostic fee associated with clearing the airbag warning light "no error" error code. For further context, * ********* ********* *** ********** ** **** ***** *** ***************************************************************************************************************************** Sincerely,Business Response
Date: 03/01/2025
Thank you for taking the time to share the detail of your experience regarding your 2016 Juke. We truly regret the circumstances that led to your complaint with the BBB.
While we agree that this situation may cause you inconvenience and that there is a cost associated with this required action, the information that is housed in the Nissan CONSULT tool is propriety. Should your vehicle require the tool to solve the concern, there may be a cost associated as charged by our authorized dealer body. Regretfully, we are not in a position to cover the associated costs.
Nissan Canada recommends that your vehicle not be driven with a passenger until the airbag light is fixed and in good working order.
We hope you understand our position in this matter.Sincerely,
Nissan Canada Inc.
Customer Answer
Date: 03/01/2025
I am rejecting this response.Initial Complaint
Date:05/12/2024
Type:Product IssuesStatus:ResolvedMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
2024 Nissan Rogue with defective infotainment system. All radio sound settings (bass, treble, balance) are reset every time car is turned off. On restart, the display still shows what was set by the user but the sound and display are out of sync. This is a safety hazard as it requires the driver to fix the radio controls every time the car is used. I had a case open with Nissan Canada (*******) and although they were able to reproduce the issue they refuse to acknowledge it as a problem and will not fix. They have closed my case and I am stuck with a car that doesn't work correctly. **** ******* **** ** ********* ** **** ** *** **** ****** ****** ** **** *** ** * ******** ***** *******Business Response
Date: 13/12/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns related to the sound settings for your 2024 Rogue. We truly regret the frustration and inconvenience this issue has caused you, leading to your complaint with the BBB.
Your situation has been thoroughly reviewed by Nissan Canada's Customer Care team, our internal Technical Support team, and your authorized Nissan dealer.
We understand how disappointing it is when the functionality of the sound settings does not meet your expectations. Unfortunately, it has been determined that this is a characteristic of the vehicle, and there is currently no resolution available. However, should a fix or enhancement become available in the future, your dealer will promptly contact you to arrange it.
Please know that your feedback is invaluable to us. Your comments have been noted and forwarded to the appropriate parties for consideration in our future product planning. It is through feedback like yours that we can continually improve our products and services, and we sincerely appreciate your input.
We thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.Customer Answer
Date: 13/12/2024
I am rejecting this response because:It is not acceptable that Nissan can pass off a broken infotainment system as a "design feature" that is working as intended. How can a radio that forgets user settings and displays invalid data on screen (the settings it failed to save) be working as designed? My problem isn't so much with the fact there is a software issue, it is the fact that Nissan is denying there is an issue and trying to pass it off as working as intended. The documentation states that user settings are saved with the user profile. They are not. I want it fixed.
Business Response
Date: 10/01/2025
Thank you for your patience as we investigated your concerns regarding the radio settings for your 2024 Rogue. We understand how frustrating this situation must be for you. Our engineering team has identified the issue as a glitch and is actively working on a solution. Unfortunately, we do not have an estimated time for the repair yet. We know this isn't the outcome you were hoping for, but please rest assured that Nissan is committed to resolving this as quickly as possible. We truly appreciate your ongoing understanding and patience.Customer Answer
Date: 23/01/2025
I have reviewed the response made by the business. I called to confirm this response was actually real and can confirm now that a new Nissan Canada Case (#*******) has been created that finally acknowledges the behavior of the radio is a software glitch and that a fix is required. At this time I am satisfied with this response and am willing to wait a reasonable amount of time for a fix.Initial Complaint
Date:02/12/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I purchased a 2019 Nissan rouge in june 2023. I began having issues with the transmission beginning of november. The nissan dealer of windsor diagnosed it and it needs a new transmission. The quote was for 7815.35 plus hst. The warranty had expired in May of this year but Nissan was capable of doing a goodwill since the car only has 65445 kilometers on it. After many back and forth conversations they denied the claim because it was not serviced at Nissan. We provided proof it was regularly serviced at ******** where I had purchased this. Nissan is aware of the problems with the cvt transmission and have even extended the warranty on some of their models to accommodate for failure. I purchased an extended warranty but the covered is maxed at 2000 not even thinking a transmission would be this amount or fail when its basically new.Business Response
Date: 04/12/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns regarding the required transmission repair for your pre-owned 2019 Rogue. We truly regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint with the BBB.
We understand how frustrating and disappointing it must be to experience such a significant issue with your vehicle, especially given its relatively low mileage and recent purchase. Your case has been thoroughly reviewed by our Customer Care Centre team, and we regret to inform you that we are unable to provide goodwill assistance towards the repair of the transmission. This decision was made after considering several factors, including brand loyalty, servicing history with Nissan, and the timing of your vehicle purchase.
Regarding the extended warranty you purchased, it appears to be a third-party product. Unfortunately, we are not in a position to comment on the terms of that plan.
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this situation has caused and appreciate your understanding. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond.Customer Answer
Date: 07/12/2024
I am rejecting this response because:
As for brand loyalty this is my first car. The car has been serviced at a dealer approved service center and nissan knows there are issues with their cvt transmissions. **** **** ******* *** ***** ****** ******* *** *** **** ****** ** ** ************. With only just over 65000 kms there is no reason for a failure unless it was defective
Business Response
Date: 18/12/2024
Thank you for your follow-up comments.
We understand that this situation is frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience it has caused. Nissan Canada has warranties in place for manufacturing defects diagnosed within the terms of the published warranty. Unfortunately, as the replacement transmission is out of warranty, we are unable to provide support in this case.
We have attached the full servicing history of this pre-owned vehicle. As mentioned previously, the vehicle has not been regularly serviced at an Authorized Nissan dealer since it has been in service.
We appreciate your understanding and thank you for allowing us to respond accordingly.Initial Complaint
Date:25/11/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
My 2016 Nissan Leaf battery was replaced on December 8, 2021. It had less than 8 bars showing on a full charge and was approved for a warranty replacement, and which guarantees the battery life for 8 years. In November 2024, my new battery began to fail, with the percentage and mileage jumping up and down by as much as 40% within a few minutes. We had it assessed by a third party who indicated that there were cells within the battery that had failed. I have uploaded photos of that report. I spoke to my local Nissan dealership service department, who advised me the battery was no longer under the 1 year replacement parts warranty and that I should call Nissan Canada. I spoke to a customer care specialist, followed by a phone call with a supervisor, *******, and was told again that the battery was not under warranty and there was nothing they would do. They were unable to answer my questions regarding the expected life span of the battery. If it is originally warrantied for 8 years, and it only lasted 3, it is not fulfilling its expected life span. The battery they gave me has failed within the expected, documented life expectancy and I need it to be fixed. I am happy to get it assessed again at the Nissan dealership if we are guaranteed that they will replace or fix the battery under warranty.Business Response
Date: 28/11/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns regarding your pre-owned 2016 LEAF. We sincerely regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint to the BBB.As this vehicle was originally sold in the USA, we have attached the USA Warranty Information Booklet for your reference.
As you mentioned, page 2 indicates that the Lithium-ion Battery Coverage is for 96 months or 100,000 miles, whichever comes first. Page 26 provides the following regarding the Limited Warranty on Genuine Nissan Replacement parts:
"Except for replacement audio components, this warranty is for 12 months or 12,000 miles from the date of installation or purchase, whichever is earlier. However, the warranty on Genuine Nissan replacement parts and Genuine Nissan accessories installed during the Nissan New Vehicle Limited Warranty will extend through, and will not end before, the end of that original warranty."
Given this, the battery installed in your vehicle in December 2021 would have been covered under warranty until May 2024, the end of the original warranty term for the Lithium-ion Battery Coverage. Unfortunately, any repairs required now would be considered "customer pay."
We regret to inform you that Nissan cannot recognize a diagnosis completed by a third party. We recommend making an appointment with your respective Nissan dealer to determine if a full battery replacement is needed or if only certain cells can be replaced.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to address your concerns. We hope to assist you in resolving this issue as smoothly as possible.
Initial Complaint
Date:24/07/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I called my local Nissan dealership in May 2024, in regards to a transmission issue I was having. They told me they had good news that my transmission had some warranty left on it due to an extension as a result of a class action lawsuit against Nissan Canada. So I booked the car in for service. I was told at this appointment that my transmission control module needed to be reprogrammed but that the transmission was fine, but that the reprogramming wasn’t covered under warranty and that I would have to pay $400, so I did that. In June 2024, I was still having the problem so I brought it back to the dealer, and they said that the transmission was fine, but that my heat shield was loose so I paid another $250 as this was not covered either. They acknowledged that the transmission was noisy but told me it wasn’t a problem and to keep driving it. In July 2024 the transmission had completely failed and they told me that I didn’t have any warranty at all, in contrary to what I was first told, and now they want $7450 more to fix the car.Business Response
Date: 24/07/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details for your concerns. We truly regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint with the BBB.
In order for us to review your situation further, kindly respond with the following information:
• Signed copy of the vehicle registration (submit attachment)
• Vehicle Identification Number (VIN)
• When was the vehicle purchased?
• Where was the vehicle purchased?
• Mileage at time of purchase?
• Current Mileage?
• Nissan Dealership you have been working with?
We look forward to your follow-up response.Initial Complaint
Date:19/03/2024
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I purchased a 2021 Nissan Rogue,16 Feb 2022 ** * ******** ******** *** I required some safety assistance and driving assistance options. I was upsold to a Platinum and with in weeks of driving noticed the Driving assistance/Cruise Blind side etc did not work and reported to Service,was told initially it was working fine.After months of these driver aids constantly shutting off I was told by service that the aids do not work properly in the prairies and Nissan is working on a software update. To date no software avail(now told late spring this year) In the meantime many recalls to the vehicle have been completed by service to include airbags, sensors, etc. To which now the vehicle rattles and squeaks. I was told it was fixed the best they can. Unhappy I spoke to the GM who offered to put me into a 2023(same sensor issues but no recalls to date) I require the driving aids and have been waiting over two years. I asked about a 2024(sensor issue resolved) but this would be all new costs again(freight,pdp,dealer charges approx $3K)and an interest rate of 6.24% (my current rate on a 2021 which never worked as specifies is 3.2%. I contacted Nissan Customer Serv and they said all dealings are up to the dealer.(not a Dealer issue) I said the initial problem is Nissan Canada and I have a vehicle that has never worked as promised and still awaiting the fix. The Dealership said their hands are tied and must charge current rates. I now have a vehicle,same issues as week one but now sounds over 10 years old. * **** * **** ****** * ******* *** * *** *** ** ************* * **** **** ** ************ *** ***** *** ** ******* ******* *** ** ** ***** ** ******* ****** ** *** ****** ****** *********** ** **** **** ****** ********* **** **** ** **** **** ******* ** **** Nissan Contacted and received the Service history and I have requested a copy as well.****** ****** ***** ** ******* **** *** *** ***********Business Response
Date: 28/03/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns with your 2021 Rogue. We truly regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint to the BBB.
The functions you have listed are currently operating as designed for the 2021 Rogue. As outlined in your Owner's Manual, these functions may become disabled in situations where the ideal conditions no longer exist, such as roads with limited structures/buildings, etc. While we understand that these limitations do no meet your needs and expectations, it is through comments such as yours that we are able to continually improve upon our products.
As an auto manufacturer, we are not in a position to participate or be involved in sales negotiations which take place at independent Nissan dealers. We encourage you to keep working with the sales team at your preferred dealer to reach a trade agreement that is suitable for you.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.Customer Answer
Date: 08/04/2024
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because: ******** ****** ** ******* **** *** ****** ******* *** ******* ********* ** *** ****** ******* *** ********* ********** *** ***** ******** ***** *** **** ***** *** ******* *********** ** *** **** **** ********** ** *** ****** ***** **** **** The vehicle was sold as functioning at the time of purchase, *** ***** ********* **** ** **** **** ** ************ *** ******* *********** * ** *** ***** **** ***** ********* **** ** ******** ** *** *** ******* **** *** *** ****** **** ******* ** * ***** ***** ***** ******** ****** **** *** *** ****** *** *********** ******** ** *** ******* **** ******** ******* The 2024 Rogue has had this issue corrected, again would not have changed/fixed if not broken! **** ** ************ *** ****** *** **** **** * ******* ******* ********** ** ******* **** ************* ***** * ***** **** **** ******** ********** **** ****** ** * ******** *** ***** *** *** ** **** ** *** **** ** ****** ************** ** ******* **** ****** **** **** ********* ** **** *** *********** ******** We own both a Qashquai and Rogue and drive both on the same road conditions. The qashauai funtions the Rogue DDOES NOT. This shows a great malfunction in the Rogues "safety assist features". I am willing to purchase a 2024 with corrected issues, but should not have to pay full delivery, PDI, higher interest etc for a new one that works and without compensation for paying full price on a 2021 that never functioned properly from the start ********** ** ***** ***** ********* **** ** ***** ** ** ******* ***** *** ** ***** * ***** **** *** **** ******** *** **** *** ******
Sincerely,
******* *****Business Response
Date: 26/04/2024
Thank you for your follow-up comments.
Your case been reviewed by numerous teams at Nissan Canada, and as previously stated, your 2021 Rogue is operating as designed. We also cannot compare the functions for your 2021 Rogue to those of your family's 2023 Qashqai.
As in all industries, our products go through continuous quality assessments and improvements as newer models are developed and and sold to our consumers. It is entirely possible that a vehicle component, function, feature, can and will likely see better performance as technologies improve.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.Initial Complaint
Date:01/03/2024
Type:Product IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
On Nov. 28 2018 I purchased a 2018 Nissan Qashqai. At the same time I purchased a Platinum Secuity Plus Added Security Plan (ASP) for $3075 + tax and a Security Plus Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement (GPRA) for an additional $295 + tax. My understanding at the time was the GPRA was to refund up to a max of $2000 minus an admin. fee of $50 if no claims were filed for the duration of the ASP. In July 2023 the vehicle was sold. Under the terms of th GPRA a refund cannot be applied for until the ASP expires. After the Nov. 28 expirey date I applied for a refund. The application was denied because I did not own the vehicle. After some calls and emails to the dealership, the administrator of the plan, and Nissan Customer Care I was told that under the exclusions section of the GPRA it states I must be the registered owner at the time of filing a claim. My understanding of this clause is that it is in reference to filing a claim for services under the ASP. No claims were ever filed. The wording in the GPRA states that you have to file a claim for a refund as opposed to applying for a refund, however it seems to me if filing a claim voids the ASP then filing a claim for a refund would void the contract as well. Under the terms of the ASP if the vehicle had been stolen or totally destroyed in July I would have been eligible for a pro-rated refund. Bottom line here is I paid out $3538.50 in good faith with the assumption that if no claims were filed I would receive a refund. Nissan paid out zero and under the terms of the agreement with zero claims filed I feel I am entitled to a refund of $1950.Business Response
Date: 04/03/2024
Thank you for taking the time to share the details of your concerns. We truly regret the circumstances that have led to your BBB complaint.
In section 5 (Exclusions) of the Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement it states that the Guaranteed Price Refund Benefit will not be provided to the customer if "You are not the current owner/lessee of the Covered Vehicle at the time You file a claim.".
In section 6 (Claim Procedures) of your the agreement, it identifies the process of obtaining the "Guaranteed Price Refund Benefit" as a "claim".
** **** ******** * **** ** **** ******** *** **********
As you have stated, you were not the owner of the vehicle at the expiration period, and as such, you would not be eligible for the Guaranteed Price Refund.
We hope this will help clear up any questions or concerns you may have.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.Customer Answer
Date: 05/03/2024
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:When I purchased the Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement (GPRA) it was represented as a way to get a partial refund if no claims were filed and no money was paid out for the duration of the Added Security Plan (ASP). The ASP expired on Nov. 28 2023 with no claims filed and no money paid out by Nissan.
You quote sections 5 and 6 of the GPRA although you didn't attach that agreement. Section 4 states I am entitled to a refund provided that I have not submitted any claims which have been paid or received any other benefits or services under the ASP agreement including but not limited to roadside assistance benefits. Again no claims were filed for the duration of the plan.
As for sections 5 and 6. Section 5 does state I have to be the owner to file a claim but no claims were filed. Section 6 lists the documentation required for a refund. It does not specifically sate that proof of ownership is required. It does state you need to provide any other documentation reasonably requested by the administrator which could be pretty much anything the administrator can ask for that will void the refund.
Using the your interpretation of the contracts even if I had the the car at the termination of the ASP and then sold it and requested the refund within 90 days but after the sale of the car I still would 't qualify for the refund. Also calling the request for a refund a "claim" seems wrong. Section 4 lists some of the claims that woud disqualify the refund and claiming compensation for any of these benefits ect. without ownership makes sense but my "claim" for a refund comes after the ASP had expired and no claims filed so ownership is not in play.
All my interactions with the administrator and Nissan customer care have indicated a total lack of understanding of the contracts with customer care advising me to contact GAP insurance which I had not heard of. I asked who this was and received no reply. Administration said the ASP automatically followed the vehicle when sold. This is false. It can if certain paperwork is submitted and signed. It wasn't. So it appears to me that Nissan wants to make it as difficult as possible to receive the agreed upon refund.
To me the intention of this agreement was to simply partially cover the cost of the ASP if no claims were made or any money paid out for the duration of the ASP.
Sincerely,
***** ****Business Response
Date: 21/03/2024
Thank you for your follow-up comments.
We have verified the communication history on the BBB complaint, *** *** ********** *** **** *********** ***** ****** ********** *** ** **** ******** **** *** ******** ********* ** **** ****** ** **** ***** *** **** **********
We agree that there were no repair or roadside claims on your Added Security Plan (ASP), ******. However, there are two separate agreements, and the term "claim" on your "Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement", refers to the process of obtaining your reimbursement if eligible. We appreciate your feedback regarding the terminology used in these agreements and will share your comments with the appropriate team for review.
While we regret your continued dissatisfaction with our response, we must reiterate that even if there were no claims were your ASP, since you were not the owner at the time of filing your "Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement" reimbursement request, you are unfortunately not entitled to this benefit.
Thank you again for the opportunity to respond accordingly.Customer Answer
Date: 29/03/2024
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:I still feel the Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement was represented as a vehicle to recoupe some of the cost of the Added Security Plan if no money was paid out by Nissan for services or benefits as listed in the plan. As I understand it the ownership of the vehicle is required to receive payment for any of the services or benefits claimed under the ASP. ** ************ *** ******* *** *** ****** ** * ******* ****** ** **** ****** ** ***** ****** **** Why would I file a claim under the ASP after it has expired? As I stated before, if I had kept the car until the plan expired and sold the car and then applied for th refund, I still wouldn't qualify.
To me this agreement is simply about how much money was paid out by Nissan for the term of the agrement. If Nissan paid out zero as in this case then a full refund would be provided. If Nissan paid out anything at all then the agreement is void and no refund is offered. Ownership of the vehicle is not an issue. **** **** **** ** ** ***** ****** ** ***** *******
*** **** ***** ** ************* ** ** ****** *** **** **** ********* ** ********** *** ********** ***** ****** ********* ** ** ***** ******* * **** ********* **** **** *** ******** * *** **** **** **** ******* *** *** ******* ************ ** ** ******* **** ***** **** *** ** *** *** ****** **********
* **** ***** * *** ****** ** *** ********** *** ********* ** ***** ******** *** ******** ***** ** **** ****** * ** ******* ** ** ********
Sincerely
***** ****Business Response
Date: 05/04/2024
Thank you for your follow-up comments.
You are correct in your description of the Guaranteed Price Refund Agreement (GPRA), however, as outlined in the agreement, if you are not the owner of the vehicle at the time of the plan expiration, you are not entitled to the reimbursement.
In section 5 (Exclusions) of the GPRA it states that the Guaranteed Price Refund Benefit will not be provided to the customer if "You are not the current owner/lessee of the Covered Vehicle at the time You file a claim.".Per section 6 (Claims) of the GPRA, the Guaranteed Price Refund Benefit is referred to as a claim.
** ****** ** **** ********** ********* *** *** ********** ** **** *** ******** *** **** ********* *** ********* *** *** **********
However, Nissan Canada's stance remains the same. Per the terms of the GPRA, you are not entitled to a refund.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond.Customer Answer
Date: 18/04/2024
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:To date none of the replies have definitively explained what the ownership of the car has to do with the refund. My interpretation of the car ownership issue in sec 4 and 5 is it is in reference to filing a claim under the ASP agreement, as in the paragraphs immediately prior to the ownership issue they are discussing terms of the ASP so when it states you must be the registered owner to file a claim one would assume it is in reference to a claim filed under the ASP.
Sec 6 does does call it a "claim" for refund but it also calls it a "request for a Guaranteed Price Refund Benifit".
The last reply from Nissan states you must be the registered owner at the end of the ASP agreement. Again, where does it state this and why is it not clearly stated if it is a requirement? If this is the case, as I've asked before, if I owned the car after the end of the agreement then sold it and applied for the refund after the sale would I qualify?
When I purchased this car I was reluctant to purchase the ASP because it was expensive and I knew to not purchase any extended service but I was assured that if I just spent another $300 for the GPRA and if no claims were filed I would receive a refund. It was even suggested that if there was a small issue I pay out of pocket rather than use the ASP so I would get the refund. I read the terms on the front page where it states clearly and was initialed by me "I am not entitled to a Guaranteed Price Refund Benifit if I file any claims or receive type of service under the ASP agreement". This would have been a good spot to say "you must be the owner of the car for the entire term of the ASP". It was simply represented as an agreement whereby a refund would be issued if no money was paid out by Nissan. **** ** **** **** ** * *** ******** *** ******* ****** ***** ***** **** **** **** **** ****** **** * *** ** **** ***** ******* ** *** ******** **** ****** ** ***** ** * ******** ** ****** ***** *** ******* Like previously stated I would have received a refund fi the car had been stolen.
So what this has come down to is what was represented to me at purchase, what my interpretation of the contract states, and what Nissan's interpretation of the contract is. ******** *** ** * **** **** *** **** ****** ******* ****** ************ ******** ** ** * ********* * **** ******* *** ** ****** ** ******** ******* *** ** ******* **** *** ***** ********** ******** ** *** ** **** ***** * **** *** ******* ***** ***** ** **** *** I have decided to not take this route any further.
Sincerely,
***** ****Initial Complaint
Date:16/10/2023
Type:Service or Repair IssuesStatus:AnsweredMore info
Complaint statuses
- Resolved:
- The complainant verified the issue was resolved to their satisfaction.
- Unresolved:
- The business responded to the dispute but failed to make a good faith effort to resolve it.
- Answered:
- The business addressed the issues within the complaint, but the consumer either a) did not accept the response, OR b) did not notify BBB as to their satisfaction.
- Unanswered:
- The business failed to respond to the dispute.
- Unpursuable:
- BBB is unable to locate the business.
I bought a 2018 Nissan Titan midnight edition brand new, & last month the truck had a delay going into reverse 2 to 3 seconds then it got worse up to 20 seconds big problem . Bought the truck new April 2018 and this problem started September 2023, contacted *********** Nissan & spoke to ****** the service manager, he said I was 5months over the 5 years & I was 60000 below the 160000 warranty. He said that he would present my case but they probably would not cover it. He also said they would not fix but replace the transmission for a cost between 10 & 12 thousand dollars, I would not want to pay that much & my mechanic took it to a transmission shop to repair it, still waiting for it to be fixed. **** ************ **** *********** ****** * ***** ******** * **** ************** * ****** ********* ** * ******* ******* **** ** **** **** ***** *** **** ******** **** * *****Business Response
Date: 24/10/2023
Thank you for taking the time to share your details regarding your 2018 Titan. We truly regret the circumstances that have led to your complaint with the BBB.
In reviewing your concerns, we discovered that your vehicle has not yet been diagnosed at a Nissan dealer and has only been diagnosed by a third party facility.
Nissan Canada relies on its authorized Nissan dealers to provide technical support to our valued customers. Without a diagnosis from an authorized Nissan dealer, we cannot comment on the recommended repairs and/or applicable costs. However, as your vehicle is out of warranty, it is likely that any associated costs will be considered customer pay.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.Customer Answer
Date: 30/10/2023
Complaint: ********
I am rejecting this response because:My wife and I have bought 5 Nissan’s over the many years, 2 Altimas and 2 Pathfinders. We thought we would upgrade to a 2018 Nissan Titan to do road trips in.
It started with the 2018 Titan leaking water into the cab and a puddle of water on the floor mat. Nissan patched the roof with what I believe was epoxy. Three different times the truck was brought in for this same issue.
Then the 2018 Titan started to have a ticking sound coming from the motor. I took it into *********** Nissan and they said “it was a thing”, what do you mean a thing I said. They would need to replace my motor now…..unbelievable.
Then 5 months past the 5 year warranty, the 2018 Titan would no longer go into reverse. I was told by the *********** service manager that the transmission would be replaced of a cost between $10,000-$12,000. I think the service manager scared me away from taking it to Nissan so I took it to a Transmission Shop. The Transmission Shop repaired it for $3750. and gave me the old parts that were replaced.
I would have taken it to *********** Nissan but he Service manager told me they will only replace the transmission, not fix it. This is why I took it to a Transmission shop.
Is this he way to treat loyal customers of Nissan?
Sincerely,
***** ******Business Response
Date: 27/11/2023
Thank you for your follow-up comments.
As stated in our previous response, without a diagnosis from an authorized Nissan dealer, we cannot comment on the recommended repairs and/or applicable costs. Though generally, Nissan recommends a full replacement for a transmission repair. However, as your vehicle was not diagnosed at an authorized Nissan dealer, we cannot confirm this would have been the recommended repair.
While we regret your ongoing dissatisfaction with our response, we must reiterate that Nissan Canada will not be in a position to cover the costs of repairs completed at a non-Nissan facility.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Nissan Canada Inc is NOT a BBB Accredited Business.
To become accredited, a business must agree to BBB Standards for Trust and pass BBB's vetting process.
Why choose a BBB Accredited Business?BBB Business Profiles may not be reproduced for sales or promotional purposes.
BBB Business Profiles are provided solely to assist you in exercising your own best judgment. BBB asks third parties who publish complaints, reviews and/or responses on this website to affirm that the information provided is accurate. However, BBB does not verify the accuracy of information provided by third parties, and does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in Business Profiles.
When considering complaint information, please take into account the company's size and volume of transactions, and understand that the nature of complaints and a firm's responses to them are often more important than the number of complaints.
BBB Business Profiles generally cover a three-year reporting period. BBB Business Profiles are subject to change at any time. If you choose to do business with this business, please let the business know that you contacted BBB for a BBB Business Profile.
As a matter of policy, BBB does not endorse any product, service or business. Businesses are under no obligation to seek BBB accreditation, and some businesses are not accredited because they have not sought BBB accreditation. BBB charges a fee for BBB Accreditation. This fee supports BBB's efforts to fulfill its mission of advancing marketplace trust.