Business ProfileforUnited Realty Group, Inc

This company represented the seller. The agent (***** ****) likely never read the contract. On 4/10 we signed an addendum to agree to a one week leaseback to the seller, if they needed it. The original contract stated that if the leaseback was contingent on the seller providing lease with proposed terms, within five days of the signed contract (also on 4/10). and then we (the buyer) would have the opportunity to accept, amend or reject the terms.On 4/29 the sellers agent, United gave a verbal they would be staying for a week and not turning over the keys at closing (contract breech 1). In addition, they would not agree any terms in writing nor to a walk through after they vacate the premises. We (buyers) had to pay for an attorney review the contract to ensure we were correct in our assessment that not getting keys, and not getting anything in writing would put us at great risk. If the seller decided not to ever leave, we would be stuck evicting them. The agent created a risk for us. She insisted that the adendum to least back was the agreement, however it was an agree to agree statement with no terms. We declined to renew the expired (exp on 4/15) amendment, since there were no leaseback terms delivered. Following this, the agent, *********, informed the seller that we were breaking the agreement instead of going back to read it, which caused a lot of seller anger. She played the blame game through 6 amendments where we attempted other accomodations requested. We offered the seller more time to close, more time to collect their things etc. without a leaseback. ********* misrepresented every agenda and inflamed the seller. It caused a more problems, including that the seller damaged the property intentionally, and breeched the contract again (breech 2 and 3) by removing items that were in the contract to remain. ***** stood behind the sellers decisions for breeches, claiming "as is" excused the seller from intentional damage. She should lose her license.