About

Important information

• Pending Government Action:

  Government Action: BBB reports on known government actions involving business’ marketplace conduct:

  CFPB v. Climb Credit Inc/Climb Investco LLC
  On October 17, 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a lawsuit against Climb Credit, Inc.; its wholly owned subsidiary Climb Investco, LLC; its wholly owned sub-subsidiary Climb GS Loan Fund 2018-1, LLC; and the originators, initial owners, and initial operators of these entities, 1/0 Holdco LLC and 1/0 Capital LLC. 1/0 Holdco LLC and 1/0 Capital LLC are headquartered in New York and Climb Credit, Inc. was headquartered in New York during most of the time period relevant to this suit and continues to conduct a significant amount of its operations there. The Bureau alleges these entities (the Climb Enterprise) worked together in online student lending for short-term vocational programs at schools with whom Climb Credit, Inc. has partnered. The Bureau further alleges that, through numerous statements since at least 2017, the Climb Enterprise assured consumers that if a Climb loan was available to fund tuition for a school’s educational program, the consumer could trust that the Climb Enterprise had vetted the quality of that program and school. The Climb Enterprise positioned Climb Credit, Inc. as a trusted intermediary by presenting it as a company that prospective borrowers could rely upon to act in their interests by identifying quality educational programs and schools. In fact, however, as the Bureau alleges, the Climb Enterprise offered loans for many programs and schools that it had not vetted for quality. This practice sought to maximize the Climb Enterprise’s revenue by inducing consumers to take out loans without regard to the actual quality of the programs offered. The Bureau asserts the Climb Enterprise violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA) by engaging in abusive acts and practices in taking unreasonable advantage of consumers’ reliance on the Climb Enterprise’s representations as to the programs and schools; violated the CFPA through deceptive acts and practices regarding the Climb Enterprise’s vetting of schools and the outcomes for consumers who attended the schools; violated the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and Regulation Z by failing to disclose finance charges on loan documents and annual percentage rates on advertisements; violated TILA and Regulation Z by using the names, emblems, or logos of certain schools to imply that they endorsed Climb loans; and violated the CFPA by committing acts or practices in violation of TILA and Regulation Z. On December 5, 2024, the Bureau filed a stipulated final judgment and order that, if entered by the court, would impose a $6,618,000 judgment for redress, which amount is suspended based on a demonstrated inability to pay, and would also require the defendants to pay $950,000 million in civil money penalties. The order would also, among other requirements, prohibit the defendants from making representations in connection with consumer financial products about outcomes by graduates, or that defendants evaluate or vet the quality or outcomes, of educational programs. The stipulated final judgment and order would also require the defendants to clearly and prominently disclose in all consumer-facing marketing materials that consumers should not rely on the defendants to identify quality educational schools and programs.
  Read more